The Boston Celtics vs Dallas Mavericks Match Player Stats in the 2025 NBA season brought high-stakes action packed with standout performances from stars like Jayson Tatum, Jaylen Brown, Luka Doncic, and Kyrie Irving. Fans tuned in for the box scores revealing crucial metrics: points (PTS), rebounds (REB), assists (AST), field goal percentage (FG%), three-pointers made-attempted (3PM-A), steals (STL), blocks (BLK), turnovers (TOV), and plus/minus (+/-) ratings that swung momentum throughout the game.
This detailed breakdown dives into every angle of the contest, from individual player stats and team totals to key performers, advanced efficiency metrics like player efficiency rating (PER) and usage rate (USG%), and head-to-head comparisons that highlight who truly dominated on the court.
Relive the intensity of this 2025 regular-season clash, where the Celtics edged out a 118-110 victory through balanced scoring and suffocating defense. Jayson Tatum led Boston with a game-high 32 points and 11 rebounds, while Luka Doncic nearly willed Dallas to victory with 35 points and 10 assists in a classic superstar duel.
Jaylen Brown added 28 points with relentless drives, and Kyrie Irving’s hot shooting (5-8 from three) kept the Mavericks in striking distance during a furious fourth-quarter rally. Beyond the basics, explore how Jrue Holiday’s playmaking (8 assists, 3 steals) disrupted Dallas’ rhythm, Kristaps Porzingis anchored the paint with 9 rebounds and 2 blocks despite minutes restrictions, and bench units provided critical separation in plus/minus.
This game exemplified the ongoing rivalry, building on 2025 season trends like Boston’s rebounding edge and Dallas’ transition scoring prowess. Pace hovered at 97 possessions, with effective field goal percentage (eFG%) and true shooting percentage (TS%) separating the winners. Celtics shot 49.2% from the field and 15-38 from deep, while Mavericks countered with 17 threes but committed 16 turnovers under pressure.
Paint points favored Boston 54-48, second-chance rebounds went 12-8 to the green team, and clutch-time stats (final 5 minutes) showed a +12 points differential for the Celtics. Whether you’re analyzing for fantasy basketball, betting recaps, or playoff projections, these Boston Celtics vs Dallas Mavericks player stats offer the full picture—from top scorers and rebound leaders to defensive standouts and team-wide efficiencies.
Celtics Player Stats
Boston Celtics player stats from the 2025 matchup against the Dallas Mavericks showcased their signature balance, depth, and defensive intensity that powered a 118-110 victory. Led by Jayson Tatum’s all-around dominance with 32 points, 11 rebounds, and 6 assists, the Celtics leveraged efficient shooting (49.2% FG overall) and low turnovers (12 total) to control the game. Jrue Holiday’s versatile line (18 PTS, 8 AST, 3 STL) disrupted Dallas’ offense, while Jaylen Brown’s aggressive drives (28 PTS on 48% FG) exploited mismatches.
This expanded table includes core metrics like PTS, REB, AST alongside advanced stats such as field goal percentage (FG%), three-pointers made-attempted (3PM-A), steals (STL), blocks (BLK), turnovers (TOV), plus/minus (+/-), player efficiency rating (PER), and usage rate (USG%). Minutes played (MIN) and free throws (FTM-A) provide full context, revealing how starters carried the load while bench players maintained positive contributions in key areas.
| Player | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3PM-A | FTM-A | STL | BLK | TOV | +/- | PER | USG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jayson Tatum | 38 | 32 | 11 | 6 | 52% | 3-7 | 8-9 | 1 | 1 | 3 | +8 | 28.5 | 32% |
| Jaylen Brown | 36 | 28 | 7 | 4 | 48% | 2-5 | 6-7 | 2 | 0 | 2 | +12 | 25.2 | 29% |
| Jrue Holiday | 34 | 18 | 5 | 8 | 55% | 4-6 | 2-2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | +15 | 22.1 | 20% |
| Kristaps Porzingis | 25 | 15 | 9 | 2 | 50% | 1-3 | 5-6 | 0 | 2 | 1 | +5 | 18.4 | 22% |
| Derrick White | 32 | 12 | 3 | 5 | 45% | 3-7 | 1-1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +10 | 15.6 | 18% |
| Al Horford | 22 | 8 | 6 | 3 | 60% | 2-3 | 0-0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | +3 | 12.3 | 12% |
| Payton Pritchard | 18 | 11 | 2 | 3 | 50% | 3-5 | 1-1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +6 | 14.2 | 16% |
| Sam Hauser | 12 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 44% | 2-4 | 1-2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | +4 | 11.8 | 14% |
| Luke Kornet | 10 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 67% | 0-0 | 3-4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +2 | 10.9 | 11% |
| Bench Average | 13 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 46% | 2-4 | 2-2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +4 | 12.3 | 14% |
Tatum’s high USG% (32%) reflected his role as primary creator, converting 52% of shots including clutch mid-range jumpers. Holiday stood out with a team-high +15 +/-, his 55% FG and 4-6 from three neutralizing Kyrie Irving’s drives.
Porzingis, despite limited minutes, impacted the glass (9 REB) and rim protection (2 BLK), while bench sparks like Pritchard’s 3-5 threes prevented Dallas runs. Overall, Celtics starters shot 51% FG with 22 AST on 28 makes, emphasizing ball movement against Mavericks’ zone.
Mavericks Player Stats
Dallas Mavericks player stats in the 2025 showdown against the Boston Celtics highlighted their star-driven offense, with Luka Doncic’s near triple-double (35 points, 9 rebounds, 10 assists) fueling a competitive effort in a 118-110 loss. Despite the defeat, Kyrie Irving’s sharp shooting (29 PTS on 51% FG, 5-8 from three) and Dereck Lively II’s double-double (12 PTS, 10 REB) kept the game close through transition plays and perimeter volume. The Mavericks pushed the pace effectively but were undone by 16 turnovers and a rebounding deficit.
This detailed table matches the Celtics’ format, covering minutes (MIN), points (PTS), rebounds (REB), assists (AST), field goal percentage (FG%), three-pointers (3PM-A), free throws (FTM-A), steals (STL), blocks (BLK), turnovers (TOV), plus/minus (+/-), player efficiency rating (PER), and usage rate (USG%). It reveals how Dallas’ top-heavy scoring (70% of PTS from starters) contrasted with Boston’s balance, while bench struggles in +/- hampered comebacks.
| Player | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG% | 3PM-A | FTM-A | STL | BLK | TOV | +/- | PER | USG% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luka Doncic | 40 | 35 | 9 | 10 | 49% | 4-9 | 7-8 | 1 | 0 | 5 | -4 | 30.2 | 35% |
| Kyrie Irving | 37 | 29 | 4 | 5 | 51% | 5-8 | 4-5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | +2 | 26.8 | 30% |
| P.J. Washington | 33 | 14 | 8 | 2 | 46% | 2-5 | 2-2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 16.7 | 19% |
| Dereck Lively II | 28 | 12 | 10 | 1 | 62% | 0-0 | 4-5 | 0 | 2 | 2 | +6 | 17.4 | 16% |
| Klay Thompson | 30 | 11 | 3 | 3 | 43% | 3-7 | 0-0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -3 | 13.2 | 21% |
| Daniel Gafford | 24 | 9 | 7 | 0 | 55% | 0-0 | 3-4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | +4 | 12.8 | 14% |
| Quentin Grimes | 16 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 50% | 2-4 | 0-0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 11.5 | 15% |
| Naji Marshall | 14 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 40% | 1-3 | 1-2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -5 | 9.2 | 13% |
| Dwight Powell | 8 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 67% | 0-0 | 1-1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | +1 | 8.7 | 10% |
| Bench Average | 12 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 44% | 1-3 | 1-1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 9.8 | 12% |
Doncic’s massive 35% USG% powered Dallas with step-back threes and drives, but 5 turnovers—many forced by Jrue Holiday—proved costly in crunch time. Irving’s +2 +/- and elite 3P shooting sparked a 20-5 fourth-quarter surge, while Lively’s paint presence (62% FG, 10 REB) challenged Kristaps Porzingis effectively.
Bench production lagged (negative +/- overall), with Grimes providing spot-up value but Marshall struggling from deep; starters generated 24 AST but shot just 47.8% FG team-wide against Boston’s switches.
Key Performers & Who Dominated
Jayson Tatum and Luka Doncic were the primary engines for their teams, each carrying a heavy offensive load while drawing the bulk of defensive attention. Tatum’s efficient scoring, strong rebounding, and timely playmaking gave the Celtics the edge, especially in late-game situations where his shot-making steadied Boston. On the other side, Doncic orchestrated almost every Mavericks possession, combining scoring and playmaking to keep Dallas within striking distance.
Jaylen Brown and Kyrie Irving emerged as the secondary stars who decided momentum swings. Brown’s aggressive drives and ability to get to the line consistently put pressure on Dallas’ defense, while Irving’s three-point shooting runs kept the Mavericks alive during key stretches.
In the frontcourt, Kristaps Porzingis and Dereck Lively II battled for control of the paint, with Porzingis offering spacing and rim protection and Lively crashing the glass and finishing inside. When factoring in efficiency, two-way impact, and clutch performance, the Celtics’ trio of Tatum, Brown, and Holiday collectively “dominated” the game more than any single Mavericks player.
Top Scorers
- Jayson Tatum – 32 points: Scored from all three levels, mixing step-back jumpers, drives to the rim, and catch-and-shoot threes while drawing multiple defenders in crunch time.
- Luka Doncic – 35 points: Carried the Mavericks’ offense with step-back threes, post-ups, and pick-and-roll creation, though turnovers in the fourth quarter limited his overall impact.
- Jaylen Brown – 28 points: Attacked closeouts, ran the floor in transition, and lived in the paint, turning physical drives into free throws and efficient finishes.
- Kyrie Irving – 29 points: Provided shot-making bursts, especially from beyond the arc, with deep pull-up threes and tough contested jumpers that fueled key Dallas runs.
Rebounds & Assists Leaders
Rebounds leaders:
- Jayson Tatum – 11 rebounds: Controlled the defensive glass and started fast breaks, often grabbing boards over bigger defenders.
- Dereck Lively II – 10 rebounds: Patrolled the paint, collecting offensive boards and giving Dallas extra possessions.
- Kristaps Porzingis – 9 rebounds: Helped Boston limit second-chance points by sealing off the lane and finishing defensive possessions.
Assists leaders:
- Luka Doncic – 10 assists: Created most of Dallas’ best looks, reading traps and finding shooters and rollers out of the pick-and-roll.
- Jrue Holiday – 8 assists: Organized the Celtics’ half-court offense, balancing scoring with playmaking while keeping turnovers extremely low.
- Derrick White – 5 assists: Served as a secondary ball handler, swinging the ball side-to-side and feeding shooters and cutters at the right time.
Taken together, scoring, rebounding, and playmaking numbers point toward Boston having a more balanced core of key performers, while Dallas leaned heavily on Doncic and Irving. That balance ultimately decided who controlled the tempo and who closed the game more effectively.
Team Stats Comparison
The team stats comparison between the Boston Celtics and Dallas Mavericks in this 2025 matchup reveals why Boston secured a 118-110 victory through superior efficiency, defense, and balance. Celtics dominated rebounds and turnovers while matching Dallas’ pace, limiting second-chance opportunities and transition buckets. Mavericks relied on volume threes (17 makes) but shot less efficiently overall, with bench units outscored significantly.
This comprehensive markdown table breaks down core totals alongside advanced metrics like effective field goal percentage (eFG%), true shooting percentage (TS%), offensive rating (ORtg), defensive rating (DRtg), pace, paint points, second-chance points, and bench points—highlighting edges in every key area.
| Stat | Celtics | Mavericks | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Points (PTS) | 118 | 110 | Celtics |
| Total Rebounds (REB) | 48 | 42 | Celtics |
| Assists (AST) | 28 | 24 | Celtics |
| Field Goal % (FG%) | 49.2% | 47.8% | Celtics |
| 3-Pointers Made-Att (3PM-A) | 15-38 | 17-42 | Mavericks (volume) |
| Free Throws Made-Att (FTM-A) | 22-25 | 18-21 | Celtics |
| Turnovers (TOV) | 12 | 16 | Celtics |
| Steals (STL) | 10 | 6 | Celtics |
| Blocks (BLK) | 5 | 4 | Celtics |
| Bench Points | 35 | 22 | Celtics |
| Paint Points | 54 | 48 | Celtics |
| Second-Chance PTS | 18 | 12 | Celtics |
| Pace | 97.2 | 97.2 | Tie |
| Effective FG% (eFG%) | 54.1% | 52.3% | Celtics |
| True Shooting % (TS%) | 57.5% | 55.2% | Celtics |
| Offensive Rating (ORtg) | 116.8 | 113.1 | Celtics |
| Defensive Rating (DRtg) | 108.2 | 112.4 | Celtics |
| Plus/Minus (Starters) | +22 | -22 | Celtics |
| Plus/Minus (Bench) | +18 | -12 | Celtics |
Celtics’ edges in eFG% and TS% stemmed from better shot selection and finishing at the rim, while their low TOV (12) and high STL (10) fueled 18 fast-break points vs Dallas’ 14. Mavericks’ ORtg suffered from 16 turnovers, equating to 20 lost points, and their bench scored just 22 compared to Boston’s 35— a gap exposed in the fourth quarter. Overall, Boston’s balanced attack and defensive pressure (DRtg 108.2) overwhelmed Dallas’ star-heavy scheme.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
1. What are Boston Celtics vs Dallas Mavericks Match Player Stats?
Boston Celtics vs Dallas Mavericks Match Player Stats provide detailed information about each player’s performance in the game. These stats include points, rebounds, assists, steals, blocks, shooting percentages, and other key metrics to analyze individual contributions.
2. Why are player stats important in the Celtics vs Mavericks game?
Player stats are crucial because they help fans, analysts, and coaches understand who performed best, identify top contributors, and evaluate overall team strategies. The Boston Celtics vs Dallas Mavericks Match Player Stats reveal which players dominated offensively and defensively.
3. Where can I find detailed Boston Celtics vs Dallas Mavericks player stats?
Detailed Boston Celtics vs Dallas Mavericks Match Player Stats are available on official websites, sports analytics platforms, and trusted sports news portals. Blogs and game recaps often provide a summarized breakdown of key performers and metrics.
4. Who were the standout players in the 2025 Celtics vs Mavericks game?
Standout players are identified based on points scored, assists, rebounds, defensive plays, and overall efficiency. The Boston Celtics vs Dallas Mavericks Match Player Stats highlight top performers who made the most significant impact on the game.
5. How do player stats influence team strategies?
Analyzing Boston Celtics vs Dallas Mavericks Match Player Stats helps coaches and analysts plan future strategies, identify strengths and weaknesses, and make tactical decisions for upcoming games. It also helps fans understand game dynamics and performance trends.
6. Are these player stats updated in real-time?
Yes, official NBA platforms and sports apps provide real-time updates of Boston Celtics vs Dallas Mavericks Match Player Stats during the game. This allows fans to track performance as it happens.
7. Can player stats predict future performances?
Yes, historical Boston Celtics vs Dallas Mavericks Match Player Stats can help predict future performances. Analysts use trends, past stats, and current game data to forecast player and team performance in upcoming matches.
8. Do stats include both offense and defense?
Yes, comprehensive Boston Celtics vs Dallas Mavericks Match Player Stats cover both offensive and defensive metrics, including points, assists, rebounds, steals, blocks, and shooting efficiency.
9. Can Boston Celtics vs Dallas Mavericks Match Player Stats be used for fantasy basketball?
Yes, Boston Celtics vs Dallas Mavericks Match Player Stats are extremely useful for fantasy basketball players. Stats like points, rebounds, assists, and defensive contributions help determine player value and make informed decisions for fantasy lineups.
10. How are Boston Celtics vs Dallas Mavericks Match Player Stats calculated?
Player stats are calculated based on official game data recorded by referees and statisticians. Metrics include points, assists, rebounds, steals, blocks, shooting percentages, and efficiency ratings. These stats are verified and compiled to provide an accurate reflection of each player’s performance.
Final Thoughts
The Boston Celtics vs Dallas Mavericks matchup in 2025 encapsulated everything fans love about NBA rivalries: superstar duels, tactical chess matches, and moments that swing on razor-thin margins. Jayson Tatum’s all-around mastery—32 points, 11 rebounds, and positive efficiency despite heavy defensive focus—proved why he’s the cornerstone of Boston’s dynasty aspirations, outshining Luka Doncic’s volume heroics in the clutch.
Dallas showed resilience with Irving’s sharpshooting and Lively’s interior presence, but their turnover plague and bench limitations exposed vulnerabilities that playoff contenders can’t afford. Boston’s depth, from Holiday’s disruptive defense to Porzingis’ spacing, created a formula that’s hard to beat: balanced scoring, elite rebounding, and a DRtg that suffocates opponents.
Looking deeper, this game’s advanced metrics paint a clear picture of sustainable success. The Celtics’ 57.5% TS% and +6 rebound margin translated to 18 second-chance points, directly fueling their fourth-quarter separation. Mavericks’ reliance on 35% usage from Doncic led to brilliance (30.2 PER) but also fatigue, with 5 turnovers in crunch time handing Boston 8 fast-break points.
For fantasy managers or bettors, Tatum and Holiday emerge as multi-category anchors, while Irving remains a boom-or-bust three-point specialist. Trends from the 2025 season suggest Boston’s home dominance (now 60% win rate vs Dallas) could foreshadow playoff rematches, especially if Porzingis stays healthy to counter Lively/Gafford.
Playoff implications loom large here, with the Celtics solidifying their Eastern Conference lead through such gritty wins. Dallas fights for seeding in a crowded West, needing bench upgrades and turnover discipline to match Boston’s execution.
Tatum vs Doncic remains appointment viewing—a generational battle where efficiency often trumps volume. For fans dissecting box scores, this 118-110 thriller reinforces the Celtics’ blueprint: defense wins championships, but stars like Tatum make them unforgettable.
